求翻译：如果说前者是地图的间接引证，那么，《坤舆万国全图》上欧洲部分的一段文字说明，则提供了无可辩驳的证据。“此欧逻巴州有三十余国……去中国八万里，自古不通，今相通七十余载云”。如果此图是利玛窦原创，以他来华的1583年计算，上推70年即明代海禁时期，是不可能与欧洲有海上通联的。注文所指“今相通七十余载”，应是中国人在15世纪初的记载，而利玛窦引用这句注语，应是参考后的直接引用。是什么意思？

正在翻译，请等待...

If the former is a map of the indirect references, then, the GON 10,000 bears on the map of the European part of a paragraph of text that is provided by irrefutable evidence. "This is the logical state ... more than 30 countries, 80,000 to go to China since ancient times, this does not work more tha

If the former is the map indirect adduction, that, "Earth International Entire Chart" on European part section of writing showed, then has provided the indisputable evidence.“This Ou Luoba the state has 30 countries ......Goes to the Chinese 80,000 miles, did not pass since old times, now is interli

正在翻译，请等待...

正在翻译，请等待...