当前位置:首页 » 翻译 
  • 匿名
关注:1 2013-05-23 12:21

求翻译:有一个辩论关于结合战略。porter(1997)建议一个企业要长期得到成功,就必须选择三个其中一个的战略,如果一家公司实现全方位得优势,它可能不能达到任何一个优势,这个情况称为“stuck in the middle".一个企业卡在中间是一个poor的情况,是什么意思?

待解决 悬赏分:1 - 离问题结束还有
有一个辩论关于结合战略。porter(1997)建议一个企业要长期得到成功,就必须选择三个其中一个的战略,如果一家公司实现全方位得优势,它可能不能达到任何一个优势,这个情况称为“stuck in the middle".一个企业卡在中间是一个poor的情况,
问题补充:

  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:21:38
A debate on the integration of strategies. porter (1997) suggested that a business you want to get long-term success, you must select the three one of the strategic, if a company is to achieve a full range of an edge, it may not achieve any advantage, this situation is called "stuck in the middle".
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:23:18
There is a debate on the integration strategy. porter ( 1997) recommended that an enterprise is a success for the long-term, it is necessary to choose one of the strategies for the 3 months, and if a company achieve all-round advantages, it may not be able to reach any one advantage, this is called
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:24:58
Some debate about union strategy.porter(1997) suggested an enterprise needs to obtain for a long time successfully, must choose three strategy, if a company realizes the omni-directional superiority, it possibly cannot achieve any superiority, this situation is called “stuck in the middle the” 0.1 e
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:26:38
There is a debate about integration strategies. Porter (1997) suggest a company to long-term success, you must select one of the three strategies for Omni-directional advantage if a company, it may not be able to achieve any advantage, this condition is called "stuck in the middle." a business card
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:28:18
 
 
网站首页

湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区

 
关 闭