|
关注:1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译:- Case: London Chartered Bank of Australia v Kerr (Held that as the other partners had not objected to the previous cheque transactions, the bank were right to assume that his co-partners had authorized the promissory note)是什么意思? 待解决
悬赏分:1
- 离问题结束还有
- Case: London Chartered Bank of Australia v Kerr (Held that as the other partners had not objected to the previous cheque transactions, the bank were right to assume that his co-partners had authorized the promissory note)
问题补充: |
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区