当前位置:首页 » 翻译 
  • 匿名
关注:1 2013-05-23 12:21

求翻译:Arkes和Blumer对沉没成本效应的解释为“先前投入的时间、金钱或其他资源会影响个体其后的决策”,提出了时间性沉没成本效应的存在;同时他们认为个人在做决策时之所以考虑沉没成本,是由于个人通常不愿意去接受先前投入的资金被浪费掉的事实。是什么意思?

待解决 悬赏分:1 - 离问题结束还有
Arkes和Blumer对沉没成本效应的解释为“先前投入的时间、金钱或其他资源会影响个体其后的决策”,提出了时间性沉没成本效应的存在;同时他们认为个人在做决策时之所以考虑沉没成本,是由于个人通常不愿意去接受先前投入的资金被浪费掉的事实。
问题补充:

  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:21:38
the arkes and blumer interpretation of the sunk cost effect for the previous investment of time, money or other resources will affect the individual subsequent decision-making ", the timing of the existence of sunk cost-effective; the same time, they believe that personal reason to consider when mak
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:23:18
And Blumer Arkes sunk cost effect for the interpretation of the previously time, money or other resources would affect the individual's decision-making, the timing of the sunk cost effect exists, and they believe that the personal out of planning and decision-making in sunk costs into account, the r
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:24:58
Arkes and Blumer to submerge “the time, the money or other resources which the cost effect the explanation was formerly invests can affect the individual after that decision-making”, proposed the timely submersion cost effect existence; Simultaneously they thought personally when makes the decision-
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:26:38
Arkes and Blumer's interpretation of sunk cost effects for "previous investment of time, money, or other resources will affect individual decisions", proposed the existence of time sunk cost effect; at the same time they believe that individual is considered sunk costs when making decisions, because
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译,请等待...
 
 
网站首页

湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区

 
关 闭