求翻译：过去的就让它过去 以下的情形是否常见？有一件不合身的衣裳，你一直不肯丢，原因是当初花了很多钱买的。支持你如此不智决定的叫“沉没成本”谬误。 这种现象背后的原因是：我们越是投资在某件事情上，就越觉得难以割舍。为了避免让“沉没成本”影响你的决策，得随时提醒自己：过去的就让它过去。是什么意思？

The past is the past following the situation common? One does not fit the clothes, you have been unwilling to lose, had spent a lot of money. Support you so unwise decision to call the "sunk cost" fallacy. The reasons behind this phenomenon: the more we invest in something, the more you find it diff

In the past it has in the past for the following circumstances are common? There is not a part of his cloak, which you have been refused to lose, because we spent a lot of money. Support your decision is not so-called "sunk cost fallacy". This is the reason behind it is: The more we invest in somet

The past let it pass by following situation was whether common? Some not good-fitting upper and lower garments, you are not willing to lose, the reason is when first flowering very many money have bought.Supports calling which your so wisdom did not decide “submersion cost” error. Behind this kind o

Let it past the following situations are common in the past? An ill-fitting clothes, and you refused to lose, because had spent a lot of money. Support you such an unwise decision called "sunk costs" fallacy. The reason behind this is: the more we invest on something, the more they find it hard to l

正在翻译，请等待...