|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：Overall, Democratic-dominated citing panels were non-compliant with cited precedent in 50% of published opinions. It should be noted that these differences between liberal- and conservative-direction precedents in published opinions decided by Democratic-dominated panels are not statistically significant. But that is, 是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
Overall, Democratic-dominated citing panels were non-compliant with cited precedent in 50% of published opinions. It should be noted that these differences between liberal- and conservative-direction precedents in published opinions decided by Democratic-dominated panels are not statistically significant. But that is,
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
正在翻译，请等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
总的来说,民主党占主导地位的以面板不符合提到50%的先例已发表的意见。 应当指出,这些差异在自由和保守的方向决定的先例,在发表意见民主为主板没有在统计上很显著。 但这是以自己的方式,有一点很有趣。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
正在翻译，请等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
总体而言，民主主导援引面板都不符合被提到的先例，在发表意见的 50%。应该指出的是这些决定由民主党主导的事务委员会发表意见的自由党和保守党方向先例之间的差异并不有统计学意义。但就它自己的方式，有趣。这是唯一交叉表的符合自由党和保守党方向先例区别不统计学意义的表 2 中。民主党主导的援引面板是达到自由方向结果时援引一个保守方向的先例 (45.8%)，以达到符合标准的自由党方向结果 (43.3%) 的可能性。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译，请等待...
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
