|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：请输入您需要翻译的文本 In a concurring opinion, Chief Justice Roberts (joined by Justices Ginsburg and Scalia) noted that the grant of monetary damages rather than an injunction hardly vindicates a patent owner’s right to exclude and suggested that use of the four factor test would not lead to significantly different results than是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
请输入您需要翻译的文本 In a concurring opinion, Chief Justice Roberts (joined by Justices Ginsburg and Scalia) noted that the grant of monetary damages rather than an injunction hardly vindicates a patent owner’s right to exclude and suggested that use of the four factor test would not lead to significantly different results than
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
Please enter you need translation of the text in a concurring opinion, chief justice roberts (joined by justices ginsburg and scalia) noted that the the grant of monetary damages rather than an injunction hardly vindicates a patent the owner's right TO the exclude and suggested that use of the four
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
Please enter the text you need to be translated * In a concurring opinion, Chief Justice Roberts (joined by Justices Ginsburg Scalia), and noted that the grant of monetary damages rather than an injunction hardly vindicates a patent owner ' s right to exclude and suggested that use of the four facto
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
Please enter the text you need translated In a concurring opinion, Chief Justice Roberts (joined by Justices Ginsburg and Scalia) noted that the grant of monetary damages rather than an injunction hardly vindicates a patent owner’s right to exclude and suggested that use of the four factor test woul
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
