求翻译：反之，占有人虽然事实上对物构成了占有，但是，在占有的背后没有本权就属于无权占有，没有本权也就是指没有合法的占有原因行为而产生的占有事实是什么意思？

On the contrary, the person in possession despite the fact constituting the possession, possession behind the right to belong to the unauthorized possession, the absence of the right to possession of the facts means no legitimate reason occupies behavior

In contrast, while it was in fact of a possession of the property, however, is not behind in the possession of the right to belong to the right, there is no right to occupy is that there is no legitimate reason for the market share of possession, arising from acts that

正在翻译，请等待...

Conversely, possessor of despite the fact that constitute a possession, however, behind does not have the right of possession is the right to possession, without this right also means that no legal possession causes arising out of the possession of facts

正在翻译，请等待...