求翻译：波格试图澄清“从非正义中获益”与“导致非正义”的区别,说明“从非正义中获益”不能简单地等同于“导致非正义”, 与”导致非正义“违反的不是同样的消极责任。波格是在全球贫困背景下来说明这种区别的: 他强调对“导致非正义”的理解应是狭义的, 即将其理解为强加不公正的、产生严重贫困的全球制度性秩序。简单的说，pogge将“导致非正义”理解为强加不公正的全球制度性秩序，并从中获益，它违反的是两个消极责任。是什么意思？

Pogue attempts to clarify the difference between the benefit from the injustice "and" lead to injustice ", and benefit from the injustice" can not be simply equated with "lead to injustice.", And "lead to injustice" violation is not the same negative responsibility. Pogue is down in the global poor

The attempt to clarify the non-justice from the benefit" and "non-justice." The difference between non-justice from the benefit cannot be simply equal to the result in a non-justice," and " " violations result in a non-justice is not the same negative. It is in the background on global poverty that

正在翻译，请等待...

正在翻译，请等待...

正在翻译，请等待...