当前位置:首页 » 翻译 
  • 匿名
关注:1 2013-05-23 12:21

求翻译:A认为, 从非正义中获益在多数情况下可以视为导致非正义, 也就是可以将其视为违反了第一种消极责任, 因而并未违反另一种消极责任。波格将其列为另一种消极责任是多余的。并且, 安万德尔认为, 从非正义中获益是什么意思?

待解决 悬赏分:1 - 离问题结束还有
A认为, 从非正义中获益在多数情况下可以视为导致非正义, 也就是可以将其视为违反了第一种消极责任, 因而并未违反另一种消极责任。波格将其列为另一种消极责任是多余的。并且, 安万德尔认为, 从非正义中获益
问题补充:

  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:21:38
a view that in most cases can be considered as leading to injustice, that is, it can be considered a violation of the first negative responsibility, and thus benefit from the injustice does not violate another negative responsibility. Pogue as another negative responsibility is superfluous. And bene
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:23:18
正在翻译,请等待...
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:24:58
A believed that, obtains benefits from the non-justice in the most situations may regard as causes non-justly, also was may regard as it has violated the first negative responsibility, thus violated another negative responsibility by no means.Pogue lists as another negative responsibility it is unne
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:26:38
A think, benefited from non-justice in the majority of cases can be seen as leading to injustice, which can be considered a violation of the first negative responsibility, and therefore did not break a negative obligation. Bottger as another negative responsibility it is redundant. And, Anwander bel
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译,请等待...
 
 
网站首页

湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区

 
关 闭