当前位置:首页 » 翻译 
  • 匿名
关注:1 2013-05-23 12:21

求翻译:甲对乙的侵害对乙来说是损失,但如果不让甲侵害乙,同样会对甲造成损失。是什么意思?

待解决 悬赏分:1 - 离问题结束还有
甲对乙的侵害对乙来说是损失,但如果不让甲侵害乙,同样会对甲造成损失。
问题补充:

  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:21:38
A B against B for the loss, but not A against B, the same would be a cause losses.
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:23:18
(A) to (b) of the infringement of a loss, but if you do not let a against B, which is also a cause of loss.
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:24:58
The armor is loses to the second grade violation to second grade, but if does not let the armor violation second grade, similarly can cause the losses to the armor.
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:26:38
Against is loss for b of a on b, but if you do not make a against b, also on a loss.
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译,请等待...
 
 
网站首页

湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区

 
关 闭