|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：甲对乙的侵害对乙来说是损失，但，如果不让甲侵害乙，同样会对甲造成损失。是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
甲对乙的侵害对乙来说是损失，但，如果不让甲侵害乙，同样会对甲造成损失。
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
A B against B for the loss, but not A against B, the same would be a cause losses.
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
(A) to (b) to (b) of that loss, but it is, if you do not let a against b, it will also have a loss.
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
The armor is loses to the second grade violation to second grade, but, if does not let the armor violation second grade, similarly can cause the losses to the armor.
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
Against is loss for b of a on b, but, if you do not have a against b, also on a loss.
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译，请等待...
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
