求翻译：我为金先生申请无罪辩护，首先，金先生当晚喝了过量的酒，已没有意识做出什么行为，也没有能力开车行驶；其次，没有直接的证据证明金先生就是驾驶者，别人不是，证据不足的情况下怎么能随意断言谁负责呢？所以，我认为金先生无罪。是什么意思？

I defend Mr. King pleaded not guilty, first of all, Mr. King drank too much wine that night, has not made any conscious act, can not afford to drive traffic; Secondly, there is no direct evidence that Mr. Kim is the driver, others not, how the absence of sufficient evidence is able to assert who is

Mr. Kim Jong Il guilty defense applications for me, first of all, Mr. Kim in the evening and drink an excessive amount of wine has no sense, what does not have the ability to drive traffic; secondly, there is no direct evidence that Mr. Kim is that motorists, others are not, without sufficient evide

I apply for Mr. Jin to defend innocently, first, Mr. Jin has drunk the excessive liquor in the evening, did not have consciousness to make any behavior, also does not have ability to drive the travel; Next, the direct evidence had not proven Mr. Jin is the driver, others are not, the evidence is ins

I apply for not guilty for gold, first of all, Mr King drank excessive amounts of alcohol that evening, have no awareness of what acts, are also incapable of driving and, secondly, there is no direct evidence to prove that Mr King was driving, others not, insufficient evidence of the circumstances h

I applied for the plea of not guilty for Mr. Jin, at first, Mr. Jin drank the excessive wine at that night, there is no consciousness to make some behaviors yet, have no ability to go by car too; Secondly, direct evidence does not prove Mr. Jin is a driver, others are not, how could affirm who is re