求翻译：目前，法律实务界对于未经审批境外影视作品的著作权保护问题的处理意见不统一，导致同类案件的判决差异较大，集中体现在对涉诉影视作品赔偿损失责任的认定方面。本文立足于我国的立法现状和实际国情，在权衡行政审批制度和民事著作权侵权纠纷处理的基础上，基本肯定第三种审判思路，并且建构性的提出了针对境外影视作品的事后审批制度，以及境外影视作品集体管理的法律规制，以期为有效解决此类问题提供理论范式和实践参考。是什么意思？

Currently, the legal practitioners for foreign film and television work without the approval of the copyright protection problem of handling non-uniform, leading to quite different judgments of similar cases, embodied in the works of Litigation video identification in liability for damages. This art

正在翻译，请等待...

At present, the legal practical realm regarding the film and television work copyright protection question processing opinion has not been unified after the examination and approval beyond the border, causes the similar case the decision difference to be big, the centralism manifests in to fords sue

At present, the legal practice without the approval of foreign film and video copyright protection handling disagreement, resulting in similar cases of judgment widely embodied in a concentrated against film damages liability of involved. This article is based on the legislative situation and the ac

At present, the legal practice circle is not unified to not examining and approving the handling suggestion of the copyright protection problems of the external films and television programs, lead to the fact similar judgement of case differ greatly, embody a concentrated reflection of tell films an