当前位置:首页 » 翻译 
  • 匿名
关注:1 2013-05-23 12:21

求翻译:第三种思路是在英皇•龙影业公司诉土豆公司案中被告虽然提出涉案作品是未经行政审批的境外影视作品。但是法院认为未经审批是行政程序问题而与原告是否取得著作权里面的信息网络传播权等经济权利没有直接关联。这一进路认为,未经批准的作品不能通过许可他人使用获得利益,但可以禁止他人使用并是什么意思?

待解决 悬赏分:1 - 离问题结束还有
第三种思路是在英皇•龙影业公司诉土豆公司案中被告虽然提出涉案作品是未经行政审批的境外影视作品。但是法院认为未经审批是行政程序问题而与原告是否取得著作权里面的信息网络传播权等经济权利没有直接关联。这一进路认为,未经批准的作品不能通过许可他人使用获得利益,但可以禁止他人使用并
问题补充:

  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:21:38
正在翻译,请等待...
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:23:18
The first 3 that line of thought is the king • dragon Film Company v. potato company involved in the case in which the defendants although works without administrative approval is outside of film and television works. But the court is of the opinion that it is without a vet whether administrative pr
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:24:58
The third kind of mentality is in the English emperors•The dragon film company sues in the potato company document the defendant although proposed is involved in a case the work not after the administrative examination and approval beyond the border film and television work.But the court thought but
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:26:38
A third idea is King · Dragon film potato company company in which the defendant put forward in connection with the work without the administrative examination and approval of foreign movies. But believe that without the approval of the Court was whether the plaintiff in administrative procedures an
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:28:18
The third thinking is that • dragon's movie company of emperor tells in Great Britain the defendant in the potato company case though proposes the works involved in the case are the external films and television programs not examined and approved. But the court thinks whether to but an administrativ
 
 
网站首页

湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区

 
关 闭