求翻译：第一种思路是中凯公司诉北京瑞得案案中，被告并未以“涉案作品是未经行政批准的作品”为由为自己的侵权行为抗辩，或者被告已经提出，但法院未对其抗辩理由进行讨论是什么意思？

正在翻译，请等待...

The first one line of thought is the company's complaint, in Beijing, a case involving the accused involved in the case and is not in the movie is without administrative approval for the work" for their own violations, or defend the accused has been proposed, but the court did not discuss the reason

The first kind of mentality is the triumphant company sues the Beijing Switzerland to result in the document document, the defendant take “is involved in a case the work is by no means as by contradicts without the administrative authorization work” for own abuse of authority, or the defendant alrea

The first case is a Camco company Beijing case, the defendant does not "in connection with the work without the approval of the administrative work" by the defence for their violations, or the defendant has been made, but the Court did not discuss their defence

The triumphant company tells in the Ruide case case of Beijing in the first thinking is, the defendant has not contradicted for one's own tort on the grounds that " the works involved in the case have been the works approved by administration ", or the defendant has already proposed, the reason disc