|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：For many academics, it may seem that returns from the study of professions and professionalization have become marginal, with less and less to be mined and more and more to quibble about. Perhaps Laurence Veysey summed up these feelings with the title of his review of yet another work on the history of profession s: “W是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
For many academics, it may seem that returns from the study of professions and professionalization have become marginal, with less and less to be mined and more and more to quibble about. Perhaps Laurence Veysey summed up these feelings with the title of his review of yet another work on the history of profession s: “W
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
许多学者，它可能似乎从返回的职业化和专业化的研究已成为越来越少，要开采更多，更吹毛求疵的边际。也许劳伦斯veysey与他界历史上的又一工作的审查的标题总结了这些感受S：“谁是一个专业的？谁在乎呢？“
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
对许多学者,似乎是,返回的研究专业和专业化已成为边际,越少在采矿和更多和更狡辩。 也许劳伦斯·维齐总结这些感情的标题与他的审查工作的又一个历史的专业S:“谁是专业人士呢? 谁知道呢? "
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
为许多院，也许看起来回归从行业和专业化的研究变得少量，与越来越少被开采和越来越推托。 或许Laurence Veysey总结了这些感觉以另外工作他的回顾的标题在行业s的历史的： “谁是专家？ 谁关心？”
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
对于许多学术界人士，似乎从研究的专业和职业化的回报已经成为边际，用更少和较少可供开采和越来越多的诡辩。也许 Laurence Veysey 总结了这些感觉和他的另一个工作的检讨的标题关于历史的专业 s:"谁的专业？谁在乎呢？"
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
