求翻译：不同的主体依据不同的价值取向在两者之间的选择导致了冲突。二者都是我们所要坚持的，但二者的界限在哪里，发生矛盾时我们又该如何解决？本文以药家鑫案为引例，探讨司法独立与新闻自由的冲突和界限。是什么意思？

正在翻译，请等待...

Based on different subjects in different orientations of value between two persons of choice has led to conflict. 2 persons are what we have to adhere to the limits of 2, however, when there are contradictions between where we are and how can it be resolved? This article in order to drug-hum case ci

The different main body basis different value orientation has caused the conflict between both choice.The two all are we needs to persist, but the two boundary when where, has the contradiction we should how solve? This article as cites precedent take the medicine Xin document, discussion jurisdicti

Different subjective depending on value choices led to conflict between. Both are what we should stick to, but where are the boundaries of the two, between a how do we solve? Taking medicine Xin case as an example in this article, conflicts and limits of the discussion on the independence of the jud

正在翻译，请等待...