|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：11. The statement is clearly accurate insofar as machines are tools of human minds. After all, would any machine even exist unless a human being invented it? Of course not. Moreover, I would be hard-pressed to think of any machine that cannot be described as a tool. Even machines designed to entertain or amuse us – for是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
11. The statement is clearly accurate insofar as machines are tools of human minds. After all, would any machine even exist unless a human being invented it? Of course not. Moreover, I would be hard-pressed to think of any machine that cannot be described as a tool. Even machines designed to entertain or amuse us – for
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
正在翻译，请等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
*11.的发言显然准确的机器都是人类心灵的工具。 所有后,将任何机器甚至存在的,除非人类发明了它? 当然不是。 此外,我将很难认为任何机器的,不能说是一个工具。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
11.声明是清楚准确，只要机器是人类思维的工具。毕竟，将任何机器甚至存在除非一个人发明了它吗？当然不是。此外，我会很难想到的任何机器，不能说是一种工具。甚至是计算机设计用于娱乐或逗我们 — — 例如，玩具机器人、 汽车和视频游戏和新奇物品 — — 事实上是工具，其发明者和发起人用于从事商务、 娱乐和娱乐的业务。而且，一台机器可以是无目的或功利化函数的人类，最终的目的，这项索赔是可疑充其量，因为我不能凭空甚至任何这种机器的一个例子。因此，当我们开发任何种类的机器时我们总是有某种形式的最
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
