|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：You are mentioning that CPOL 1 and 2 have a viscosity which is too high. Both polishes are not meant to flow, they are supposed to be like a paste. You mentioned in your previous email that only CPOL 1 was behaving like this. Both polishes should display be very similar or almost the same viscosity characteristics是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
You are mentioning that CPOL 1 and 2 have a viscosity which is too high. Both polishes are not meant to flow, they are supposed to be like a paste. You mentioned in your previous email that only CPOL 1 was behaving like this. Both polishes should display be very similar or almost the same viscosity characteristics
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
你提的是，CPOL位1和2有一个粘度过高。两个抛光并不意味着流动，他们都应该像粘贴。你刚才提到在以前的电子邮件1 CPOL只有这样的行为。两个抛光应该显示是非常相似或几乎相同的粘度特性
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
你是一提的是,cpol1和2有粘度是太高。 抛光剂是既不意味着流动,他们是要像一粘贴。 你刚才提到电邮,只有在您以前cpol1是如此。 抛光剂都应显示是十分类似或相同的粘度几乎特点
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
正在翻译，请等待...
 |
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
你提的 CPOL 1 和 2 有太高的粘度。这两种擦亮剂不是流，他们应该是像成糊状。你提到你以前的电子邮件中 CPOL 1 只像这样的表现。这两个擦亮剂显示应非常相似或几乎相同的粘度特性
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
你提的 CPOL 1 和 2 有太高的粘度。这两种擦亮剂不是流，他们应该是像成糊状。你提到你以前的电子邮件中 CPOL 1 只像这样的表现。这两个擦亮剂显示应非常相似或几乎相同的粘度特性
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
