求翻译：废死国家诚然多为环境较佳、社福较好、人权较张者，但未必废死为因、进步为果。若是如此，我们反而应主张，在社会环境到达这些国家的水平以前，不宜废死。毕竟政策之制定不宜邯郸学步，应考量社会风俗民情之差异。是什么意思？

Indeed many national waste death better for the environment, better social welfare, human rights were more sheets, but not necessarily die as a result of waste, and progress for the fruit. If so, instead we should stand in the social environment before reaching the level of these countries should no

While many countries spent die for a better environment, human rights, social welfare is better than Mr CHEUNG who die as a result, they may not be abolished, progress as a result. If that is the case, and instead, we should advocate the social environment, before arriving at the national level, it

The waste dead country many is indeed good for the environment, society the luck is good, human rights opening, because but waste dies for, the progress is not necessarily the fruit.If so, we instead should advocate, arrives these national in the social environment before the level, not suitable was

Waste dead countries admittedly much better, work with better, human rights, waste but not necessarily die for cause, progress for effect. If so, we should instead advocate, before social environment reach the level of those countries, not waste dead. After all, the policy of development should not

Waste dead countries admittedly more for a better environment, better social welfare, human rights, but not necessarily scrap death, progress as a fruit. If so, we should instead advocate, before social environment reach the level of those countries, not waste dead. After all, the policy of developm