当前位置:首页 » 翻译 
  • 匿名
关注:1 2013-05-23 12:21

求翻译:these results were interpreted as implying that women were taking on primarily buffer roles (losing more jobs than their share of employment would suggest) in some sectors such as manufacturing, but were in more protected occupations in other sectors where their share of job loss was even lower than proportionate to th是什么意思?

待解决 悬赏分:1 - 离问题结束还有
these results were interpreted as implying that women were taking on primarily buffer roles (losing more jobs than their share of employment would suggest) in some sectors such as manufacturing, but were in more protected occupations in other sectors where their share of job loss was even lower than proportionate to th
问题补充:

  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:21:38
这些结果被解释为默许,妇女承担主要部分行业如制造业缓冲作用(损失比他们的就业份额更多的就业机会会建议),但均在其他部门,他们的工作份额的损失更是受保护的职业比例的他们的就业比重较低
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:23:18
这些结果被解释了,因为暗示妇女主要承担缓冲作用(失去更多工作比就业他们的份额将建议)在某个区段例如制造业,但是在失业他们的份额低于均衡对他们的就业份额的其他区段的被保护的职业
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:24:58
这些结果在其他区段被解释了,因为暗示妇女主要承担 (失去更多工作的缓冲角色比就业他们的份额) 在某个区段将建议例如制造业,但是在被保护的职业,工作损失他们的份额低于均衡到他们的就业份额
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:26:38
这些结果被解释为意味着妇女正在上主要缓冲角色 (丢失更多的就业机会比他们的就业份额会建议) 在一些部门如制造,但在更多保护其工作损失的份额甚至低于其就业份额成正比其他部门的职业
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:28:18
这些结果被解释为意味着女人主要在具有缓冲器作用 ( 失去更工作比他们的份额的就业会建议 ) 在一些领域中例如制造,但是在他们的份额的失业更低的其他领域中的更受保护的职业中比到他们的就业股份成比例
 
 
网站首页

湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区

 
关 闭