求翻译：这样就提出了针对关键词“建构”的决定性问题：在何等程度上身体类比,在后现代的语境下仍然，或再次，有可能？在何等程度上尚能以温克尔曼的方式合理地讨论肉体的建筑以及其肢体的建筑建构？尤其是，在多大程度上我们的躯体概念可以延伸、可以变异、可以调整？我们到底在何等程度上陷于机体臣服于机械之境？究竟何处才是躯体彻底失去其特性的界限？是什么意思？

This made for the keyword "construction" of the decisive question: To what extent the physical analogy, in the context of post-modern still, or again, it is possible? To what extent can still Winkelmann way to reasonably discuss the physical construction of buildings and construction of its body? In

This raises the targeting of key word " "Building a framework for the decisive issue physical analogy: the extent of contexts, in post-modern, or again, there are still possible? The extent of the winkelman has yet to be reasonable to discuss physical construction as well as its physical constructio

Like this proposed in view of the key word “the construction” decisive question: In the what kind degree the bodily analogy, in under after modern linguistic environment still, or once more, had the possibility? Shang Nengyi Winkelman's way discussed the human body reasonably in the what kind degree

This raises for the keyword "constructing" the decisive question: to what extent physical analogy, still in the context of postmodern, or again, it is possible? To what extent can still reasonably discussed by J.J. Winckelmann means building construction of buildings, and its limbs of the body? In p

The portal frame construction anatomy -like architecture has symbolized the light commemorative experiment: One kind has contained the transparent memorial, actually by no means gives up under this kind of extreme condition take construct the assembling main body as the premise.Which building in don