|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：In 2010, the United States Supreme Court held in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission that laws prohibiting corporate and union political expenditures were unconstitutional. Citizens United made it legal for corporations and unions to spend from their general treasuries to finance independent expenditures, bu是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
In 2010, the United States Supreme Court held in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission that laws prohibiting corporate and union political expenditures were unconstitutional. Citizens United made it legal for corporations and unions to spend from their general treasuries to finance independent expenditures, bu
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
在2010年，美国最高法院在联合公民诉联邦选举委员会举行，是违宪的法律，禁止企业和工会的政治支出。美国公民，花一般国债资金独立支出为企业和工会的法律，但并没有改变禁止企业或工会直接向联邦运动的贡献。那些仍禁止[3] [4]寻求这类组织有助于联邦候选人的运动仍然必须依靠传统PACS用于这一目的。然而，他们可能会花钱的独立运动没有形成一个PAC
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
In 2010 The In United States Supreme Court held in Citizens United V. Federal Election Commission that laws prohibiting corporate and union political expenditures were unconstitutional.
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
In 2010, the United States Supreme Court held in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission that laws prohibiting corporate and union political expenditures were unconstitutional. Citizens United made it legal for corporations and unions to spend from their general treasuries to finance independ
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
In 2010, the United States Supreme Court held in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission that laws prohibiting corporate and union political expenditures were unconstitutional. Citizens United made it legal for corporations and unions to spend from their general treasuries to finance independ
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译，请等待...
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
